⚡ Powered by Mode Mobile
Market Munchies🔍
LIVE
EUR/USD1.1759●▲ +0.32%Bitcoin73,345●▲ +3.67%Ethereum2,257.9●▲ +3.01%S&P 5006,889.9●▲ +0.95%NASDAQ21,412●▲ +1.12%DOW40,212●▼ −0.43%Gold3,238.4●▲ +1.82%Oil (WTI)61.42●▼ −2.15%GBP/USD1.3124●▲ +0.18%US 10025,411●▲ +0.71%Silver32.14●▲ +0.54%XRP2.183●▼ −1.08%EUR/USD1.1759●▲ +0.32%Bitcoin73,345●▲ +3.67%Ethereum2,257.9●▲ +3.01%S&P 5006,889.9●▲ +0.95%NASDAQ21,412●▲ +1.12%DOW40,212●▼ −0.43%Gold3,238.4●▲ +1.82%Oil (WTI)61.42●▼ −2.15%GBP/USD1.3124●▲ +0.18%US 10025,411●▲ +0.71%Silver32.14●▲ +0.54%XRP2.183●▼ −1.08%
Analysis

The News Looks Terrible. So Why Is the Stock Market Going Up?

U.S. warships exchanged fire with Iran this week. Consumer sentiment just hit a record low. And the S&P 500 closed higher on Friday. Here's why that's not as crazy as it sounds — and why you still shouldn't feel too comfortable. If you've been following the news this week,…

Market Munchies·May 9, 2026·9 min read
pexels-jakubzerdzicki-36755611 1

U.S. warships exchanged fire with Iran this week. Consumer sentiment just hit a record low. And the S&P 500 closed higher on Friday. Here's why that's not as crazy as it sounds — and why you still shouldn't feel too comfortable.

 

If you've been following the news this week, you know it's been a lot. U.S. Navy destroyers took missile fire in the Middle East. Gas prices hit $4.54 a gallon nationally. Consumer confidence just dropped to its lowest recorded level.

And yet, when the closing bell rang on Friday, the S&P 500 was up 0.84%, hitting a new all-time intraday high and finishing the week up about 2% — its sixth consecutive winning week. The Nasdaq climbed 1.71%. Both indexes closed at records.

If your reaction to that is "...what?" — you're not alone, and you're not wrong to be confused. This is one of the most disorienting things about investing for beginners, and it trips people up constantly. So let's break down exactly what's going on.

📰 Markets Don't Read the Headlines. They Read Expectations.

 

Here's the key thing to understand: the stock market is not a real-time reaction machine to the news. It's a forward-looking pricing machine that's constantly asking one question — is what's happening right now better or worse than what we already expected?

By the time a piece of news hits your feed, professional traders and algorithmic systems have already read it, analyzed it, and acted on it — often within milliseconds. The price you see on any given stock or index already reflects everything that's publicly known about the world.

So when the Iran conflict escalated in late February, markets didn't wait to price in higher oil prices and inflation risk. They started immediately. Which means by the time you see a headline about warships firing on each other, the market has already moved. The question investors are asking now isn't "is this bad?" — it's "is this worse than what we already anticipated?"

That's exactly why Friday's jobs report — 115,000 jobs added, way above the 65,000 economists were expecting — sent stocks higher even as the Middle East was on fire. The jobs number was better than what markets had already assumed. That surprise mattered more than the ongoing geopolitical noise they'd already accounted for.

📉 "Bad News Is Good News" — And Why That's Not as Dumb As It Sounds

 

There's a phrase traders use that sounds insane until you understand it: "bad news is good news."

Here's what they actually mean. If the economy slows down enough — if GDP stumbles, if job growth stalls — the Federal Reserve is more likely to cut interest rates to stimulate growth. And lower interest rates are, generally, very good for stocks. Cheaper borrowing means companies can invest more, consumers can spend more, and future earnings get valued more highly.

So paradoxically, a soft economic number can actually send markets up, because investors immediately start gaming out what it means for Fed policy. Weak data → Fed might cut rates → stocks rally. This is a genuine dynamic, not a Wall Street conspiracy — and it's playing out right now. With rate cut expectations already pushed off the table for 2026 due to sticky inflation from the war, any hint that the economy is cooling faster than expected could actually be a green light for the Fed to ease — and stocks would likely respond accordingly.

This also explains why it's not always as simple as "bad news = sell." Sometimes bad news is exactly what the market needs to hear.

📚 But Don't Get Too Comfortable — Not All Oil Shocks End the Same Way

 

Here's where a lot of "markets always recover!" articles get it wrong, and where you deserve a more honest take.

The examples you usually see — Pearl Harbor, 9/11, Ukraine — are cherry-picked for their relatively quick recoveries. After 9/11, the S&P 500 had recovered all its losses within a month. After Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, it gained nearly 9% over the following three months.

But there's one historical parallel that almost nobody mentions in these "stay calm" pieces, and it's the one that's actually most relevant to right now: 1973.

When OPEC imposed its oil embargo in October 1973 — triggered by U.S. support for Israel in the Yom Kippur War — the market didn't bounce back in a month. It fell more than 40% over the following year. According to J.P. Morgan's historical analysis, the 12-month real return on the S&P 500 after the 1973 embargo was -37%. It took six years for the index to return to even.

Why was 1973 so different? Because the oil shock wasn't a short-term disruption — it changed the fundamental cost structure of the entire economy. Inflation got embedded into wages and prices. The Fed had to get brutal to fix it. Corporate earnings got crushed across almost every sector.

Sound familiar? The current Strait of Hormuz disruption is blocking roughly 20 million barrels per day — compared to 4.5 million in 1973. Brent crude is trading around $100–$110. Core inflation is already running at 2.6% and rising. The Fed has essentially taken rate cuts off the table for the foreseeable future.

Oxford Economics has already cut its global GDP growth forecast by 0.4 percentage points specifically because of the sustained energy drag — and warned that the figure gets worse the longer the Strait stays disrupted.

None of that means 2026 is 1973 — and there's one genuinely important structural difference worth understanding. In 1973, the U.S. imported roughly 35% of its oil. Today, thanks to the shale revolution, the U.S. is a net oil exporter. That's the primary reason we haven't already seen a 1970s-style collapse — higher oil prices hurt American consumers, but they also benefit American producers in Texas, North Dakota, and the Permian Basin, partially offsetting the damage. It's a genuine buffer that didn't exist fifty years ago.

But here's what that buffer doesn't protect: corporate earnings. If oil stays at $100–$110 a barrel through the summer, transportation costs, manufacturing inputs, and energy bills will start eating into profit margins across almost every industry that moves physical goods. Airlines, retailers, manufacturers, and logistics companies are all staring down a cost squeeze that doesn't care how much shale the U.S. produces. Analysts at Citi and Goldman Sachs are already running the 1973/1979/1990 playbooks to model it out. Even if the Fed eventually cuts rates — which would normally boost stocks — falling earnings could cancel out the benefit entirely. The market can look past a lot. It has a harder time looking past shrinking profits. That's the "earnings wall" that doesn't show up in the daily price moves but is quietly building in the background.

A peace deal could start to change the picture — but even if the war ended tomorrow, inflation that's already embedded into wages and supply chains doesn't disappear overnight. The genie is at least partially out of the bottle.

💡 So What Should a Beginner Investor Actually Do?

 

Three things are genuinely true at the same time here, and holding all three in your head simultaneously is the actual skill:

Don't try to trade the headlines. By the time you read something and decide to act, the market has already moved. Retail investors who panic-sold during the COVID crash in March 2020 missed a near-complete recovery in less than two months. The same pattern played out after 9/11, after the Gulf War, and after the Ukraine invasion. Reacting to individual news events has a poor track record.

Do understand why markets sometimes go up on bad news. It's not irrational — it's the market pricing in Fed policy expectations, short-covering, and the delta between what happened and what was feared. Once you internalize this, you stop being surprised every time stocks rise on a terrible week, and you start asking the smarter question: what exactly is the market pricing in right now, and is it right?

Watch the three things that actually matter. Day-to-day price moves are noise. The signal is in: (1) whether inflation gets embedded into wages and prices — which would tie the Fed's hands for years, not months; (2) whether corporate earnings start coming in below expectations as energy costs bite into margins; and (3) whether a peace framework materializes that reopens the Strait and lets oil normalize. Those three factors will determine whether 2026 looks more like 2022 (sharp drop, quick recovery) or 1973 (slow bleed, years of pain). The daily market moves tell you almost nothing about which one it'll be.

The honest bottom line isn't "don't worry, markets always recover." It's this: the market going up on a bad week is usually rational, but it doesn't mean the coast is clear. Understanding the difference between short-term pricing mechanics and long-term structural risk is what separates an investor who makes better decisions from one who just gets lucky.

Sources

 

Market Munchies and Mode Mobile communications are for informational purposes only, and are not a recommendation, solicitation, or research report relating to any investment strategy, security, or digital asset. All investments involve risk including the loss of principal and past performance does not guarantee future results.

Any information contained in this commentary does not purport to be a complete description of the securities, markets, or developments referred to in this material. The information has been obtained from sources considered to be reliable, but we do not guarantee that the foregoing material is accurate or complete. There is no guarantee that any statements or opinions provided herein will prove to be correct.